Artigo

Link between negative work environment and risk of exclusion

Publicado: 20 January 2008

A 2007 study, entitled ‘Uneven chances in life as a consequence of an uneven work environment’ (Ulige livschancer som følge af ulige arbejsmiljø (in Danish, 184Kb, PDF) [1]) and conducted by the Economic Council of the Labour Movement (Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd [2], AE Rådet [3]), shows a clear link between work environment and the risk of later exclusion from the labour market. The findings also show that work environment factors that can cause exclusion are unevenly spread among different groups in society.[1] http://www.aeraadet.dk/media/filebank/org/Arbejdsmiljøanalyse-2.pdf[2] http://www.aeraadet.dk/[3] http://www.aeraadet.dk/

The shortage of labour is a much debated issue in Denmark. A study shows that a poor work environment is closely associated with labour market exclusion, and that the work environment factors that can cause exclusion are unevenly spread. In particular, strained work postures, degree of influence over work, poor development opportunities and heavy lifting are factors that can lead to exclusion. Promoting a better work environment is therefore essential in order to prevent exclusion.

A 2007 study, entitled ‘Uneven chances in life as a consequence of an uneven work environment’ (Ulige livschancer som følge af ulige arbejsmiljø (in Danish, 184Kb, PDF)) and conducted by the Economic Council of the Labour Movement (Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd, AE Rådet), shows a clear link between work environment and the risk of later exclusion from the labour market. The findings also show that work environment factors that can cause exclusion are unevenly spread among different groups in society.

People with no or a lower education, or those on low incomes, have a higher risk of early death, early retirement (anticipatory pension or voluntary early retirement pension) than those with a higher education or high income. The AE Rådet study shows that specific work environment factors partly explain uneven life chances.

Details of study

The study looks at the correlation between work environment factors in 1995 and exclusion from the labour market in 2004. It is based on national data (Den Nationale Arbejdsmiljø Kohorte, [NAK](http://www.arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk/Nationale Data/NAK2005.aspx)) compiled by the National Research Centre for the Working Environment (Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø, NFA) and examines the work environment of some 5,652 Danish workers in 1995. The work environment of the same group of workers is examined once again in 2000 and 2005. These data have been linked with data from Statistics Denmark (Danmarks Statistik, DST) on factors such as income and education. This has allowed for an analysis of elements such as the income and education of those who have participated in the study and how these people have managed in the labour market later on.

Study results

The overall results indicate that:

  • the risk of exclusion from the labour market is, to a substantial degree, affected by the work environment (Table 1);

  • the different groups in society are – if one looks for example at level of education – unevenly exposed to work environment strains (Table 2);

  • it is therefore not surprising that exclusion is unevenly spread in society (Table 3).

The results in Table 1 show that there is a clear link between a person’s own assessment of their ability to work and early retirement. More specifically, people who in 1995 stated that their ability to work was reduced had a higher tendency to be retired or deceased than those stating that their ability to work was not reduced.

Table 1: Work status based on person’s own assessment of their work ability, 2004 (%)
This table outlines the work status in 2004 of people who in 1995 were aged between 30–55, based on person’s own assessment of their work ability.
Own assessment of whether ability to work is reduced (1995)* Still working Anticipa-tory pension** Decea-sed Voluntary early retire-ment pension*** Total Number of answers
% of total answers
Yes, to a high degree 63.7 17.4 8.1 10.9 100.1 46
Yes, to some degree 77.0 13.3 2.5 7.2 100 295
No, not especially 82.4 8.5 2.2 6.9 100 240
No, not at all 87.7 3.6 1.8 6.9 100 3,066
Total 86.1 4.9 2.0 7.0 100 3,647

Notes: The table findings are adjusted according to age, as people who answer that their ability to work is reduced to a high or some degree are, on average, older than the other respondents. *Question: Would you say that your work ability is reduced due to sickness, accidents or attrition? **People who are no longer able to work due to health reasons. *** In Denmark, people can choose to retire at the age of 60 and receive a pension benefit, which is payable between early retirement and normal retirement pension.

Source: AE Rådet, 2007

The findings outlined in Table 2 show, for example, that the risk of exposure to serious noise during at least half of the working time for a person with a bachelor’s degree is only 48% of that which could be expected on the basis of age and gender composition. Moreover, people without an education or with a vocational education are more exposed to hard physical strains than those with a higher education. Work environment exposures are therefore unevenly distributed among the different educational groups in society.

Table 2: Frequency of work environment strains by education (%)
This table summarises the frequency of work environment strains of different educational groups as % of expected exposures on basis of age and gender composition.
Work environment strains No education/ student Vocational education Short/ medium-term education Degree/ long-term education Total
Frequency/average value as % of expected strains
Serious noise at least half of working time 111 101 92 48 100
Serious indoor climate problems at least half of working time 103 103 94 77 100
Strained work postures at least half of working time 122 109 53 40 100
Monotonous work at least half of working time 119 109 44 86 100
Lifting eight kilos or more at least once an hour 119 110 68 8 100
Index for influence 95 101 106 107 100
Index for development opportunities 95 99 109 109 100
Index for social support 95 102 99 98 100

Source: AE Rådet, 2007

The results in Table 3 indicate the risk of exclusion according to level of education in 1995. The findings show that, for a person without an education in 1995, the risk of receiving an anticipatory pension was 78% higher in 2004 (index 178) than that which could be expected in relation to age and gender composition overall. Conversely, for those with a long-term education or a doctorate degree (PhD), the risk of receiving an anticipatory pension is about one quarter the risk of others with a corresponding age and gender composition (index 26). People with no education therefore have a higher risk of labour market exclusion than those with an education due to work environment factors. Thus, the higher the level of education, the lower the risk of exclusion.

Table 3: Risk of exclusion by level of education, 2004
This table highlights the relative risk of exclusion in 2004 of people who in 1995 were aged 30–55 years.
Level of education Deceased Anticipatory pension Voluntary early retirement pension Marginalis-ed* Number of people
  Relative risk (%)  
No education 136 178 122 138 505,508
Student 98 79 63 144 74,940
Vocational 93 79 104 88 690,191
Short-term education 70 56 75 91 75,554
Medium-term education/Bachelor degree 73 49 68 60 255,896
Long-term education/doctorate degree 60 26 31 69 100,205
Total 100 100 100 100 1,707,294

Note: *Marginalised refers to people who, within the last three years, have been unemployed/in activation for at least 80% of the time.

Source: AE Rådet, 2007

Work environment factors most likely to lead to exclusion

In addition, the study examines which work environment factors are most likely to lead to exclusion. The analysis found that age, strained work postures, influence, development opportunities, gender and heavy lifting had a statistically high impact on whether, after nine years, a person had died, went into early retirement or was marginalised. Conversely, noise, indoor climate, social support and monotonous work did not have a statistically high impact on exclusion.

Labour market exclusion may therefore be prevented substantially through efforts aimed at ensuring a better work environment. As the increased efforts in recent years to improve the work environment in Denmark have not yet produced the desired effects, further efforts are therefore needed in this respect.

Mette Ballebye and Helle Ourø Nielsen, Oxford Research

A Eurofound recomenda citar esta publicação da seguinte maneira.

Eurofound (2008), Link between negative work environment and risk of exclusion, article.

Flag of the European UnionThis website is an official website of the European Union.
How do I know?
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
The tripartite EU agency providing knowledge to assist in the development of better social, employment and work-related policies