Trade unions, employer organisations and public institutions play a key role in the governance of the employment relationship, working conditions and industrial relations structures. They are interlocking parts in a multilevel system of governance that includes European, national, sectoral, regional (provincial or local) and company levels. This section looks at the key players and institutions and their role in Bulgaria.
Public authorities involved in regulating working life
The state plays a general role of regulating, controlling and facilitating industrial relations through its institutions. The Ministry of Labour and Social Policy is the main national authority dealing with labour regulations and working conditions. It carries out consultations and cooperates with representative organisations of workers and employers at national level in the development and implementation of policies on the labour market, the protection of the national labour market and training of the workforce.
There are no specialised labour courts in Bulgaria. All individual labour conflicts are dealt with by the general courts. In 2016, as a result of a change to the Labour Code (Article 45 ‘Representation in court’), trade unions and their branches are entitled, at the request of employees, to represent them in court.
As a mediation and arbitration body, the National Institute for Conciliation and Arbitration (NICA) of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy functions on a tripartite basis. The main aim of NICA is to facilitate the settlement of CLDs through mediation and arbitration as an alternative, extrajudicial means of dispute settlement for collective labour conflicts.
The General Labour Inspectorate (a government agency) monitors the compliance of the labour legislation on quality of work and on health and safety at work.
The national Working Conditions Fund was created under the Law on Health and Safety at Work, providing finance for projects improving working conditions with to national-, branch- and sector-level importance.
Representativeness
The general rules of representativeness are described in Articles 34 and 35 of the Labour Code. The procedure for settlement of the representative social partners is described in Article 36 of the Labour Code. The census of social partners’ membership is held every four years but data are not publicly available.
Trade unions must prove that they meet the following criteria to be accepted as nationally representative (Labour Code, Article 34).
- They must have at least 50,000 members (up from 75,000 in 2012).
- Territorial representation: they must have local branches in more than a quarter of the municipalities in the country.
- They must have a national governing body.
- Length of experience: they must have the status of a legal entity, obtained by registration as a non-profit association at least three years before the census.
The employer organisations need to prove the following (Labour Code, Article 35).
- They must have at least 1,500 member companies with no fewer than 50,000 employees in total, or 100,000 employees within all members of the employer organisation, working with employment contracts.
- They represent employers in more than a quarter of the NACE code-defined economic activities with no fewer than 5% of employees in each economic activity, or a minimum of 10 employers in each activity.
- Territorial representation: they represent employers in more than a quarter of Bulgaria’s municipalities.
- Length of experience: they have the status of a legal entity, obtained by registration as a non-profit association at least three years before the census.
Trade unions
About trade union representation
The Labour Code (Articles 4 and 5) provides that employees/employers have the right, without prior authorisation, to freely form trade unions/organisations, voluntarily join or leave them, considering their statutes only. No exclusion of employees or sectors is set out in the Labour Code. Civil servants can also form and be members of trade unions (in accordance with the Law for Civil Servants). Freedom of association is set out in the Constitution Act (Article 49).
Some limitations are set out by other legislative documents, such as the Law for the Ministry of the Interior. The employees of the security system have the right to join trade unions for the Ministry of the Interior only (none of the nationally representative social partners).
By 2003, union membership was steadily decreasing. Union density declined between 2008 and 2013, but relatively less than membership rate. This was due to overall employment decreasing by more than 15% in 2008–2012 and the shrinkage of the manufacturing, services and public administration sectors. Since 2004, the main reasons for decline have been the privatisation of state companies and the fact that more than 90% of companies are small and medium-sized enterprises, which are challenging for unions to organise within. New forms of employment, such as self-employment, and an increasing number of workers in the grey economy, have also played a role. According to Dimitrov (2021), the trade union density was still showing a trend of decline in 2020, although at a slower pace. Data from official censuses show that trade union density was 16.9% in 2008, 16.4% in 2012 and 15.4% in 2016.
In general, trade union density is higher in the public sector (education and healthcare) and in several manufacturing industries (metal, chemicals and mining), but it is low in the rest of manufacturing, services and construction (Kirov, 2019).
Trade union membership and density, 2010–2020
Variable | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Source |
Trade union density in terms of active employees (%)* | n.a. | n.a. | 16.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 15.3 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database 2021 |
Trade union density in terms of active employees (%) | 19.8 | n.a. | n.a. | 13.7 | 14.0 | 13.8 | 13.9 | 12.8 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Visser, 2019** |
Trade union density in terms of active employees (%) | 21.2 | n.a. | 21.9 | 20.9 | 20.9 | n.a. | 15.4 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 15.0 | 14.9 | Dimitrov, 2021*** |
Trade union membership (thousands)**** | n.a. | n.a. | 420 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 407 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database 2021 |
Trade union membership (thousands) | 393.4 | 361.45 | 346.58 | 351.2 | 361.6 | 363.3 | 364.5 | 350.5 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Visser, 2019** |
Trade union membership (thousands) | n.a. | n.a. | 364 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 351 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 335.9 | Dimitrov, 2021*** |
Notes: * Proportion of employees who are members of a trade union among all employees. ** Union density figures represent union density rate, which is net union membership as a proportion of wage and salary earners in employment, and membership figures represent net union membership. *** With regard to trade union density, data for 2010 and 2012 are based on the national representative survey Work Climate Index, and data for 2013 and 2014 are based on the national representative survey Syndibarometer (both conducted by the Institute for Social and Trade Union Research of CITUB). Data for 2016–2020 are based on the official censuses and are underestimated, as they are calculated based on the trade union membership of the representative trade unions only. **** Trade (labour) union membership of employees is based on (household) labour force surveys or any other surveys (for example, working conditions surveys, social attitudes surveys) asking the respondent about their union membership in their main job. Trade (labour) union membership of employees derived for the total (labour) union membership and adjusted, if necessary, for trade (labour) union members outside the active, dependent and employed labour force (i.e. retired workers, self-employed workers, students, unemployed people). n.a., not available; OECD/AIAS ICTWSS, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts.
Sources: Visser, 2019; Dimitrov, 2021.
Main trade union confederations and federations
The most important nationally representative trade union confederations in Bulgaria are CITUB and the Confederation of Labour Podkrepa (CL Podkrepa).
CITUB is the largest trade union in Bulgaria. It was established in 1990, on the basis of the only trade union during the communist period (Balgarski Profesionalni Sauzi). CL Podkrepa was formed on 8 February 1989. During its early years (up to 1991), CL Podkrepa combined trade union and political activities. However, CL Podkrepa rapidly became the second largest trade union confederation in Bulgaria, covering all economic sectors and regions. CITUB held its ninth congress in May 2022, and incumbent President Plamen Dimitrov was re-elected for a new five-year mandate. In its 11th congress (8–9 February 2023), CL Podkrepa celebrated its 34th anniversary, demanding a decisive income increase in all economic sectors and an accelerated increase in the minimum wage.
Both national representative trade unions are running nationwide information campaigns, such as ‘Grey Kills’ (CITUB, 2019), aiming to reduce the share of the informal economy in Bulgaria and prioritising activities in construction, agriculture, manufacturing and automotive industry. In 2019, CL Podkrepa, in cooperation with the Bulgarian Medical Association, the Bulgarian Association for Professional Healthcare and the Trade Union Federation of the Ministry of the Interior, initiated a campaign for decent working conditions and increased pay for night work.
In 2018, CITUB and CL Podkrepa held joint protest actions aiming to protect the Bulgarian electric power industry, requesting a new state power strategy for 2030–2050 to compensate for losses as a result of the carbon emissions of power plant Maritsa Iztok 2. On 12 January 2023, both confederations organised a protest called ‘Let’s protect the energy security of the country’, which related to the commitment made in the national recovery and resilience plan to reduce carbon emissions from the power sector by 40% by the end of 2025 compared with 2019 levels. During discussions on the national budget, the National Health Insurance Fund budget and the social security budget for 2023, the trade unions demanded a 10–15% increase in the minimum statutory wage.
Main trade union confederations and federations
Name | Abbreviation | Number of members | Involved in collective bargaining? |
2012 | 2016 | 2020 |
Confederation of Independent Trade Unions of Bulgaria (Конфедерация на независимите синдикати в България) | CITUB/КНСБ | 275,762 | 271,312 | 262,394 | Yes |
Confederation of Labour Podkrepa (Конфедерация на труда Подкрепа) | CL Podkrepa/КТ Подкрепа | 88,329 | 79,567 | 73,536 | Yes |
Total | | 364,091 | 350,879 | 335,930 | |
Note: These are nationally representative trade union confederations and federations.
Sources: Adapted from Dimitrov (2021), quoting data from the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy from official censuses conducted in 2012, 2016 and 2020.
Employer organisations
About employer representation
All employers have the right to join employer organisations (Labour Code, Article 5). One company can be a member of more than one employer organisation. This multiple membership makes it difficult to evaluate the real density and membership rate.
Through amendments of the Labour Code in 2016, the parliament adopted lower criteria (50,000 members, as it was between 1992 and 2012, instead of 75,000 members) for the national representativeness of the social partners.
According to the publicly available census data from 2012, employer organisations cover approximately 14% of the companies in Bulgaria. After the 2016 census, this is calculated at 15.5% according to Dimitrov (2018), with an increase to 17.6% in 2020 (Dimitrov, 2021).
As the table below shows, the density in terms of establishments increased between the 2016 census and the 2020 census, while density in terms of employees decreased. This may mean that more, but smaller, establishments choose to become members of the employer organisations.
Employer organisation membership and density, 2012–2020
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2016 | 2019 | 2020 | Source |
Employer organisation density in terms of active employees (%) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 55.3 | n.a. | n.a. | OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database 2021 |
Employer organisation density in terms of active employees (%) | 14 | n.a. | n.a. | 53.1 | n.a. | 42.3 | Dimitrov (2017), based on the 2016 census Dimitrov (2021), based on the 2020 census |
Employer organisation density in private sector establishments (%)* | n.a. | 7 | n.a. | n.a. | 6 | n.a. | European Company Survey 2013 and 2019 |
Employer organisation density in private sector establishments (%)* | 29 | n.a. | n.a. | 15.5 | n.a. | 17.6 | Dimitrov (2017), based on the 2016 census |
Notes: * Percentage of employees working in an establishment who are members of any employer organisation that is involved in collective bargaining. OECD/AIAS ICTWSS, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts.
Sources: Adapted from Dimitrov (2017, 2021), quoting census data from 2016 and 2020 from the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy; own calculations based on NSI statistics on the number of the enterprises in 2019 and the number of employees in 2020 (first nine months) and data from National representative survey “Work-climate-index” (ISTUR of CITUB).
Main employer organisations
According to the latest census, in 2020, there are five nationally representative employer organisations: the BIA, the CEIBG, BICA, the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Union for Private Economic Enterprise (UPEE). The Bulgarian Employers’ Association of Innovative Technologies was not deemed representative (Council of Ministers2021).
The sectoral employer organisations are part of collective bargaining through the branch councils for cooperation. However, not all the branches and economic activities have collective agreements in place.
The Association of the Organizations of Bulgarian Employers (AOBE), registered in 1995, is an alliance of the employer organisations that were nationally representative prior to 2017 (the BIA, BICA, the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the CEIBG). The AOBE is a collective member of the International Organisation of Employers and an active participant in the work of Employers Group 1 of the European Economic and Social Committee. Since 1 January 2018, AOBE has been an observer member of the Business and Industry Advisory Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. For 2023, the main priorities of AOBE are described in 44 measures in six key areas for the Bulgarian economy, including the business environment and the economy, energy and the green transition, education and the labour market, social policy, European policies and investments (AOBE, 2023).
Bozhidar Danev was Chairman and later Executive Chairman of the BIA for 25 years, until his death in 2018. In 2017, he was elected as Vice President of Business Europe. On 5 December 2018, Radosvet Radev was elected Chairman of the BIA Board. On 1 September 2021, Dobri Mitrev was elected Chairman of the BIA Board, replacing Radosvet Radev following his death.
UPEE is a non-governmental employer organisation of microenterprises and small and medium-sized companies, founded in 1989 by the first entrepreneurs in Bulgaria to promote economic initiatives and representation of the collective interests of employers in the labour market and industrial relations. UPEE is a member of SME United and the International Organisation of Employers.
The employer organisations have been very active in public discussions about labour legislation changes, for instance on raising the minimum wage, pension reform and social security issues. They often in opposition to the trade unions.
In 2018, the employer organisations boycotted the national negotiations for the new minimum insurance thresholds. The representatives of employer organisations continue to put pressure on the government for the facilitation of access of non-EU skilled labour to the Bulgarian labour market. In 2021, the employer organisations opposed the minimum wage set by the government.
Main employer organisations and confederations
Name | Abbreviation | Members 2016/2020 | Number of employees with an employment contract 2016/2020 | Involved in collective bargaining? | Sectoral/branch organisations/economic activities 2016/2020 |
Bulgarian Industrial Association (Българска стопанска камара) | BIA/БСК | 5,668 /15,867 | 132,217 /219,127 | Yes | 117/73 branch organisations in 117/62 economic activities |
Confederation of Employers and Industrialists in Bulgaria (Конфедерация на работодателите и индустриалците в България) | CEIBG/КРИБ | 4,598 /6,813 | 378,869 /309,251 | Yes | 114/92 sectoral/branch organisations in 117/71 economic activities |
Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association (Асоциация на индустриалния капитал в България) | BICA/АИКБ | 8,281 /6,083 | 317,617 /131,710 | Yes | 101/77 sectoral/branch organisations in 60/60 economic activities |
Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Българска Търговско-промишлена палата) | BCCI/БТПП | 39,669 /36,999 | 341,409 /230,105 | Yes | 73/85 branch organisations in 74/51 economic activities |
Union for Private Economic Enterprise (Съюз за стопанска инициатива) | UPEE/ССИ | 2,651 /8,452 | 51,742/65,959 | Yes | 40/37 sectoral/branch organisations in 39/46 economic activities |
Source: Adapted from Dimitrov (2021), quoting data from the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy from official censuses of employer organisations carried out in 2016 and 2020.
Tripartite and bipartite bodies and concentration
The main tripartite body at national level is the NTCC. It has Council of Ministers commissions (created in 1993) dealing with labour-related issues, social security and quality of life. Another tripartite body is the Economic and Social Council (established in 2001). Under the aegis of the ministries, in accordance with the Labour Code, there are established branch councils for tripartite cooperation dealing with labour-related issues, social security and living standards in the respective economic branches. The nationally representative social partners participate in management bodies of the state institutions in charge of labour and social security issues.
The bipartite bodies are organised through branch/sectoral councils for social cooperation that are engaged in social dialogue on various labour- and social security-related issues between employers and trade union representatives. According to CITUB, bipartite social dialogue takes place in 12 councils for social cooperation. There is no comprehensive database for all bipartite bodies and their activity. At company level, social dialogue on health and safety at work is conducted by the working conditions committees/groups.
The mechanism for information and consultation is set out in the Labour Code (Article 7a). The number of employee representatives in the company’s general assembly depends on the size of the company. Collective bargaining is regulated by the Labour Code (Chapter 4).
The social pact for economic and social development of Bulgaria up to 2009 was signed by the government and the representative social partners. An agreement on 59 anti-crisis measures was drawn up by the NTCC in 2010. Two more national agreements were signed in 2010: one for home-based workers (Bulgaria’s ratification of the International Labour Organization’s Home Work Convention of 1996) and one for teleworking (implementing the European social partners’ Framework Agreement on Telework of 16 July 2002).
According to Dimitrov (2021), the tripartite social dialogue gained momentum in 2020 as a result of important pending amendments of laws. The most important issues discussed by the NTCC were employment measures and compensation schemes, income protection and financial support for businesses in times of crisis, and the state budget for 2021. After nearly a year of negotiations, a national tripartite agreement was signed in June 2020 covering measures in five areas: the business environment and the economy; energy; the European Green Deal; demography, education, the labour market and labour migration; and social protection policies. In 2021, the NTCC also discussed the decree of the council of ministers for an increase in the poverty line.
Main tripartite and bipartite bodies
Name | Type | Level | Issues covered |
National Tripartite Cooperation Council (Национален съвет за тристранно сътрудничество) | Tripartite | National | All labour-related issues |
Economic and Social Council (Икономически и социален съвет) | Tripartite | National | Economic and social development |
National Council for Employment Promotion (Национален съвет за насърчаване на заетостта) | Tripartite | National | National plans for employment and measures for increasing employment |
National Consultative Council on Vocational Training of the Labour Force (Национален консултативен съвет по професионална квалификация на работната сила) | Tripartite | National | Legislation and issues regarding vocational education |
National Council on Equality between Women and Men (Национален съвет по равнопоставеността на жените и мъжете) | Tripartite | National | Equality of men and women |
National Working Conditions Council (Национален съвет по условия на труд) | Tripartite | National | Health and safety |
National Institute for Conciliation and Arbitration (Националният институт за помирение и арбитраж) | Tripartite | National | Conciliation and arbitration |
Source: Authors’ own elaboration.
Workplace-level employee representation
There is no universal form of workplace representation in Bulgaria. The Labour Code allows for the election of employees as representatives at company level for information and consultation (Directive 2002/14/EC) and as participants in company general assemblies, but this is rarely done in Bulgaria. In most cases, employees transfer the representation function to the trade unions. Two other forms of workplace representation are possible: employee representatives for the protection of employees’ economic and social interests, and health and safety committees/groups.
The employee representatives can be elected in all companies with at least 50 employees (Labour Code, Article 7c) and can vote in the company’s general assembly in information and consultation procedures. The number of representatives (between three and nine) depends on the size of the establishment.
According to Dimitrov (2018), employee representatives on information and consultation have been elected in only 20% of the enterprises covered by the law. Official national data are not available.
A law relating to the election of worker/employee representatives in the European works councils of multinational companies, supervision/management bodies of European companies and European cooperative societies has been in force since 2006. According to Dimitrov (2021), by 2017 there were more than 30 multinational company subsidiaries with elected representatives in the councils.
Regulation, composition and competences of the representative bodies
Body | Regulation | Composition | Involved in company-level collective bargaining? | Thresholds for/rules on when the body needs to be/can be set up |
Representative for Information and Consultation (представители за информиране и консултиране) | Labour Code (Трудов кодекс) | 3–9 employees (depending on the establishment size) | No; the representative can vote in the company’s general assembly in information and consultation procedures | Once there are at least 50 employees in the establishment |
Trade Union Organization at the company(синдикална организация в предприятието) | Labour Code (Трудов кодекс) | Employees in the company | Yes | A minimum of three members are required |
Source: Authors’ own elaboration.