Hoppa till huvudinnehåll
Abstract

Ett av EU:s centrala strategiska mål är att se till att Europa blir den första klimatneutrala kontinenten, med nettonollutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2050. För att uppnå detta mål antog EU:s beslutsfattare det klimatpolitiska 55 %-paketet under 2021, som innehöll mer ambitiösa mellanliggande avkarboniseringsmål för att minska utsläppen med 55 procent fram till 2030. I denna rapport presenterar vi prognoser från en global makroekonomisk modell om hur detta komplexa klimatpolitiska paket kan påverka den sektoriella och yrkesmässiga sysselsättningsstrukturen i EU fram till 2030, samt dess effekter i olika regioner och länder. En central slutsats är att sysselsättningseffekterna av de politiska åtgärderna inom ramen för 55 %-paketet sannolikt kommer att vara marginellt positiva på aggregerad EU-nivå, men kommer att variera mellan länder, regioner och sektorer. Detta kommer dels att bero på graden av beroende av koldioxidintensiva industrier, dels på förmågan att dra nytta av miljöanpassningsmöjligheter.
 

Key messages

•    Totalt beräknas EU:s klimatpolitiska 55 %-lagstiftningspaket leda till att 204 000 nettoarbetstillfällen skapas i EU, utöver referensscenariots sysselsättningstillväxt på 6,7 miljoner nya nettoarbetstillfällen 2019–2030. Dessa mycket blygsamma nettovinster ligger i linje med de flesta befintliga uppskattningar av avkarboniseringspolitikens sysselsättningseffekter i EU.

•    Även om de övergripande sysselsättningsprognoserna för 2030 till följd av 55 %-paketet är svagt positiva, är de absoluta sysselsättningseffekterna av de politiska åtgärderna inom ramen för paketet högre i de regioner som påverkas negativt – till exempel i polska och rumänska regioner med en relativt hög andel sysselsättning inom gruv- och utvinningssektorerna – medan positiva sysselsättningseffekter är mer spridda mellan olika regioner. Detta motiverar regioninriktad finansiering av stödåtgärder, såsom de territoriella planerna för en rättvis omställning.

•    Byggsektorn kommer sannolikt att vara den sektor där efterfrågan på arbetskraft kommer att öka mest på grund av 55 %-paketet. Inom den sektorn kommer arbetstillfällena att öka både på området energieffektivitetsförbättring och på området ytterligare kapacitetsutveckling för förnybar energi.

•    Medan sysselsättningen totalt sett förväntas öka fram till 2030, sker den blygsamma sysselsättningsökningen som prognostiseras inom ramen för 55 %-paketet inom låg-till-medel- och medelavlönade jobb som inte kräver universitets- eller högskoleutbildning.

•    Prognoser för sysselsättningseffekter påverkas i hög grad av genomförandet av de politiska åtgärderna. Större vinster vad gäller både avkastning och sysselsättning kan potentiellt uppstå då koldioxidintäkterna återvinns, öronmärks och används för att sänka skatter på arbete.

Executive Summary

One of the core strategic objectives of the EU is to ensure that Europe becomes the first climate-neutral continent, with net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Carbon neutrality is an ambitious objective that requires large investments sustained over time. In particular, it will require dramatic changes in the way we source and use energy. The impacts of the policies required to achieve the green transition will vary considerably among sectors, and will affect countries’ income and employment levels and the composition of employment, creating employment in some sectors and destroying it in others. In July 2021, the Commission adopted a package of proposals to make the EU’s climate, energy, land use, transport and taxation policies fit for reaching the 55% emission reduction target by 2030: ‘Fit for 55’. In this report, we provide projections from a global macroeconomic model of how the Fit for 55 policy package may affect the territorial, sectoral and occupational structure of employment in the EU by 2030. 
 


Policy context 

In the EU’s aim to become carbon-neutral by 2050, 2030 is a critical staging post. In 2021, EU policymakers adopted more ambitious intermediate decarbonisation objectives than before, and updated policies accordingly. The principal objective of the Fit for 55 policy package is to achieve a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared with 1990 levels by 2030 (the prior target was a 40% reduction). The Fit for 55 package is a complex package of proposals that operates on many fronts; it extends the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System, revises upward targets for renewable energy use and energy efficiency, puts in place a carbon border adjustment mechanism and tightens emissions standards for cars and vehicles. The package is also an evolving set of policy commitments. For example, in 2023 the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament have agreed provisionally to further strengthen the contribution of renewables to overall energy consumption by 2030 (to 42.5% from 40 indicated in 2021, up from 32% in 2018). Anticipating the impact of developing EU climate policy on the composition of employment in EU labour markets provides essential data to policymakers tasked with ensuring that the green transition is a just transition.  
 


Key findings

  • Most projections of employment impacts of decarbonisation policies in the EU show very modest net gains, rarely much more than 0.5% compared with the baseline.
     
  • According to our estimates based on the GEM-E3-FIT macroeconomic model, the employment impacts of the main Fit for 55 policies are likely to be marginally positive at EU aggregate level in the main model specification. A net 204,000 jobs are projected to be created in the EU Member States as a result of the Fit for 55 package, in addition to the baseline employment growth of 6.7 million net new jobs between 2019 and 2030.
     
  • The employment effects vary across regions and countries based on their reliance on carbon-intensive industries on the one hand and their capacity to take advantage of greening opportunities on the other. Negative employment effects are more likely in some central and eastern European countries (for example, Poland and Romania) and regions with relatively high shares of workers still working in extractive industries; positive employment effects are projected in southern European countries (in particular, Spain and Italy) and regions with natural endowments (wind and sun), developed energy efficiency infrastructure and capacity to manufacture renewable energy equipment. 
     
  • With jobs in both energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy capacity development, the sector likely to benefit most in terms of employment is construction. There will also be increased employment in market services as relative prices favour a shift in the structure of the economy towards ‘cleaner’ sectors, reinforcing the employment shift to the services sector. 
     
  • While employment overall is projected to improve towards 2030, the small boost to employment forecast for Fit for 55 tends to occur in medium-low and medium wage jobs that do not require tertiary qualifications. 
     

Policy pointers 

  • Even though overall employment projections for 2030 arising from Fit for 55 are mildly positive, the absolute employment impacts of Fit for 55 policies are higher in the regions negatively affected – for example, in Polish and Romanian regions with a relatively high share of employment in mining and extractive sectors – while positive employment impacts are more dispersed across regions. This supports the rationale for region-focused funding of supportive measures, such as the territorial just transition plans.
     
  • Projected employment impacts are sensitive to the details of policy implementation. Potentially greater gains in both output and employment may arise in a context of dedicated climate-related fiscal policies where carbon revenues are recycled in order to reduce labour taxes. Such revenues may also assist with the retraining necessary to facilitate employment reallocation to less carbon-intensive sectors and occupations.
     
  • The source of finance for the large capital investment required by the green transition is also an important determinant of whether Fit for 55 policies will be employment-positive or -negative in practice. When funds are available without the need to crowd out existing investment plans, the macroeconomic implications are positive. However, when the financing of greening investments is not loan-based, both output and employment are projected to decline, albeit marginally.
     
  • Policies aimed at lowering greenhouse gas emissions will have differential impacts on employment by sector and by occupation, increasing the demand for some jobs and decreasing it for others. They have to work hand in hand with education, training and employment policies in order to prepare workers with the required skills and competencies to contribute to the collective decarbonisation effort. 

The report contains the following lists of tables and graphs.

List of tables

  • Table 1: Datasets used in the analysis
  • Table 2: Scenario framework
  • Table 3: Overview of policies in REF
  • Table 4: List of policies in FIT55
  • Table 5: Projection of EU total employment in REF
  • Table 6: Share of employment in REF, by sector, EU (%)
  • Table 7: Share of employment in REF, by occupation, EU (%)
  • Table 8: Sectoral demand for additional investments in FIT55 compared with REF (€ billion)
  • Table 9: Top five and bottom five NUTS 2 regions in terms of absolute employment changes in FIT55 relative to REF, 2030
  • Table A1: GDP projection in REF by Member State (%)

List of figures

  • Figure 1: Schematic representation of GEM-E3-FIT model
  • Figure 2: Annual growth rate of total employment in REF, EU, 2019–2030
  • Figure 3: Impact of FIT55 on EU GDP and employment, 2030
  • Figure 4: Impact of FIT55 on sectoral employment, 2030
  • Figure 5: Impact of FIT55 on key clean energy manufacturing sectors, 2030
  • Figure 6: Additional investments in FIT55 versus REF
  • Figure 7: Share of mining, quarrying and manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products in total employment in REF, 2030 (%)
  • Figure 8: Greenhouse gas intensity in REF, 2030 (kt CO2eq per €1 million GDP)
  • Figure 9: FIT55 impact on employment by country, 2030
  • Figure 10: Impact of FIT55 on employment levels in the mining and quarrying sector at national level, 2030
  • Figure 11: Impact of FIT55 on employment levels in the manufacture of machinery and equipment sector at national level, 2030
  • Figure 12: Impact of FIT55 on employment levels in the construction sector at national level, 2030
  • Figure 13: Impact of FIT55_Crowd on EU GDP and employment, 2030
  • Figure 14: Impact of FIT55_Crowd on sectoral employment, 2030
  • Figure 15: Impact of FIT55_Crowd on employment by country, 2030
  • Figure 16: Impact of FIT55_SocSec on EU GDP and employment, 2030
  • Figure 17: Impact of FIT55_SocSec on sectoral employment, 2030
  • Figure 18: Impact of FIT55_SocSec on employment by country, 2030
  • Figure 19: Recent employment shifts by job wage quintile compared with projected shifts, 2019–2030 (millions)
  • Figure 20: Country employment projections with (a) largest projected employment declines and (b) largest projected employment gains, FIT55 versus REF, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure 21: Regions with (a) largest projected employment gains and (b) largest projected employment declines, FIT55 versus REF, 2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure 22: Projected employment shifts by job–wage quintile in FIT55 2030 compared with (a) 2019 REF and (b) 2030 REF, EU, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure 23: Projected employment shifts by qualification and job–wage quintile in FIT55 2030 compared with (a) 2019 REF and (b) 2030 REF, EU, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure 24: Projected employment shifts by sex and job–wage quintile in FIT55 2030 compared with (a) 2019 REF and (b) 2030 REF, EU, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure 25: Deviations from the 2030 REF projections – employment shifts by job–wage quintile (EU) in the FIT55 and variant scenarios (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A1: EU GDP projection in REF
  • Figure A2: Employment change, by job–wage quintile, REF compared with FIT55, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A3: Employment change, by job–wage quintile and sector, REF compared with FIT55, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A4: Employment differences, by job–wage quintile and sector, REF compared with FIT55, 2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A5: Employment change, by job–wage quintile and education level, REF compared with FIT55, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A6: Employment differences, by job–wage quintile and education level, REF compared with FIT55 2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A7: Employment change, by job–wage quintile and sex, REF compared with FIT55, 2019–2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A8: Employment differences, by job–wage quintile and sex, REF compared with FIT55, 2030 (thousand jobs)
  • Figure A9: Employment differences, by job–wage quintile, REF compared with each scenario, 2030 (thousand jobs)
Number of pages
58
Reference nº
EF23009
ISBN
978-92-897-2354-1
Catalogue nº
TJ-03-23-378-EN-N
DOI
10.2806/522425
Permalink

Cite this publication

Disclaimer

When freely submitting your request, you are consenting Eurofound in handling your personal data to reply to you. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. More information, please read the Data Protection Notice.