Key factors determining quality of work are job and income security, and social, mental and health aspects of work. Despite a high degree of satisfaction, motivation and identification with work, employees complain of a lack of recognition. These are the findings of a 2004 survey in Germany, which explores perspectives on quality in work.
In 2004, the Internationale Institut für Empirische Sozialökonomie (INIFES), in cooperation with the research company TNS Infratest Sozialforschung, conducted an ad-hoc survey on the issue What is good work? Requirements from the perspective of employed people (in German, 592Kb PDF). The survey was carried out among a representative sample of the German working population - 7,444 people including employees and self-employed persons - as part of the New quality of work initiative (INQA). The survey focused on assessing quality in work and particularly examined motivation, work satisfaction and identification with work. In relation to these aspects of quality in work, INQA issued an analysis of the survey’s results (in German).
In terms of methodology, the study begins with a review of relevant theoretical and empirical research at national and international level. This review constitutes the basis for the survey’s research framework as well as for the questionnaire on quality in work and work satisfaction.
The questionnaire (in German, 592Kb PDF) includes questions on satisfaction with regard to content of work, recognition of work done, workload, design of the workplace, physical and mental demands, degree of responsibility, information flow, social relations, capability of supervisors, security of job and work-life balance issues. A range of questions focused on assessing what ‘good work’ is.
Recognition for work done
The survey’s main findings reveal that, despite a high motivation and identification with work, only one third of workers consider that their work is adequately recognised and the majority believe that it rarely or never is.
Almost half of the workers (49%) often or always feel ‘empty’ and burned out, and 43% of the respondents claimed that they are not able to recover fully from work during non-working time. In addition, some 30% of the workers surveyed find their work often or always frustrating (Table 1).
How often did it occur in the last four weeks that you: | Never | Seldom | Often | Always |
---|---|---|---|---|
felt particularly committed to the company | 9 | 39 | 33 | 18 |
felt empty and burned out | 9 | 41 | 44 | 5 |
could not recover from work during your time off | 16 | 39 | 39 | 4 |
found your work frustrating | 23 | 46 | 27 | 3 |
felt uneasy about your occupational future | 24 | 36 | 31 | 8 |
Source: INIFES, First results, 2005
Work satisfaction
The analysis of the survey results distinguishes between different levels and types of work satisfaction and dissatisfaction, namely:
- satisfied with the existing situation - work satisfaction is based on the fact that everything remains as is (stabilisierte Zufriedenheit );
- conditionally satisfied - work satisfaction is related to possible changes in the future (progressive Zufriedenheit );
- satisfied in a resigned way - work satisfaction comes from the view that ‘it could be worse’ and that ‘one should be happy to have work today’ (resignierte Zufriedenheit );
- dissatisfied without any prospect for change - workers openly express their dissatisfaction about their workplace and do not see any prospect for change or possibility to initiate change (fixiert Unzufriedene );
- dissatisfied, but ready to initiate change - workers openly express their dissatisfaction about their workplace but are ready to take the initiative to change the situation, either on their own or in conjunction with others (konstruktiv Unzufriedene );
- satisfied or dissatisfied without specific reason (diffus Zufriedene or diffus Unzufriedene ).
Many workers (46%) appear to be satisfied or conditionally satisfied with their work. Overall, satisfaction rates are higher in the private sector than in the public sector and are also higher at workplaces with employee representation.
Moreover, older workers seem to be more satisfied than younger workers (Table 2). Young people believe that they do not have an opportunity to use their creativity at work or to take responsibility. They are also dissatisfied with regard to pay equity and job security.
Form of work (dis)satisfaction | Total | Sector | Employee representation | Age | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public | Private | Yes | No | Less than 30 years | 30-50 years | 50 years and more | ||
Satisfied with the existing situation | 21 | 23 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 11 | 23 | 29 |
Conditionally satisfied | 25 | 30 | 23 | 29 | 18 | 30 | 26 | 15 |
Satisfied in a resigned way | 15 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 17 |
Dissatisfied without any prospect for change | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Dissatisfied, but ready to initiate change | 21 | 16 | 22 | 18 | 24 | 26 | 20 | 17 |
Satisfied or dissatisfied without specific reason | 14 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 15 |
Source: INIFES, First results, 2005
Differences in the perception of work satisfaction also exist between west and east Germany: in west Germany, 47% of the workers surveyed are satisfied and conditionally satisfied, compared with 42% of the respondents in east Germany.
The highest degree of work dissatisfaction is perceived by the survey respondents in relation to income level (44%), further education (38%) and quality of supervisor (36%). Table 3 shows notable differences between the workers’ responses in west and east Germany.
Areas most in need of action: | West | East | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Income level | 42 | 55 | 44 |
Further education/qualification | 39 | 34 | 38 |
Quality of supervisor | 37 | 30 | 36 |
Job security | 29 | 40 | 31 |
Relations with colleagues | 28 | 24 | 27 |
Job demands | 24 | 20 | 23 |
Employee participation | 22 | 23 | 22 |
Working time arrangements | 21 | 24 | 21 |
Pace of work and pressure to perform well | 20 | 14 | 19 |
Occupational health and safety | 12 | 13 | 12 |
Source: INIFES, First results, 2005
Job demands
A majority of the workers surveyed consider that the demands of their jobs in terms of workload, occupational knowledge and skills, and ability to organise and plan, are just right. However, 34% of the survey respondents feel that the workload is too high, 27% believe that they cannot utilise all their skills and knowledge, and 28% find that they cannot demonstrate their organisational and planning abilities (Table 4).
Mismatch in job demands regarding: | Far too high | A little too high | Just right | A little too low | Far too low |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload | 4 | 30 | 53 | 10 | 2 |
Occupational knowledge and skills | 1 | 11 | 60 | 22 | 5 |
Ability to organise and plan | 1 | 9 | 62 | 22 | 6 |
Source: INIFES, First results, 2005
Defining good work
The survey respondents were asked to rank 60 aspects of what they believed constituted ‘good work’. They attached the highest importance to income and job security, followed by aspects of social relations at work, job content, the opportunity to fulfil oneself at work, and behaviour of and recognition by supervisors. Occupational health and safety ranked seventh.
Most important aspects | Extremely important | Very important |
---|---|---|
Fixed, reliable income | 63 | 30 |
Job security | 63 | 25 |
Enjoyment of work | 47 | 38 |
Respect as a human being by supervisor | 45 | 39 |
Permanent employment contract | 59 | 24 |
Support from colleagues | 32 | 44 |
Occupational health and safety | 35 | 39 |
Significance or meaningfulness of work | 28 | 46 |
Pride in one’s work | 30 | 43 |
Variety in work | 29 | 44 |
Source: INIFES, First results, 2005
Anni Weiler, AWWW GmbH ArbeitsWelt - Working World